S'abonner

Connection

The Implications of U.S. Policy Stagnation toward the Arctic Region

The Implications of U.S. Policy Stagnation toward the Arctic Region

U.S. policy toward the Arctic is driven by three cross-cutting factors. Despite the relentless pace of these drivers, U.S. policy has remained largely stagnant, allowing Russia and China to shape the region’s future, note CSIS’s Heather Conley and Matthew Melino.

Large-scale collective action in the Arctic Ocean: the role of international organizations in climate governance - ScienceDirect

Map showing the Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984

The United States' National Strategy for the Arctic Region - Arctic Portal

A Battle for the Arctic Is Underway. And the U.S. Is Already Behind. - POLITICO

How critical science infrastructure investments help put Arctic security challenges on ice - Atlantic Council

The current situation in the Arctic and its impact on the national security of the United States.doc - Running head: The current situation in the

Climate Change Impacts in the United States - Index of - U.S. Global

US National Strategy for the Arctic Region: An Assessment Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses

How war in Ukraine is changing the Arctic

Arctic Region: The Legal Status and Russia-USA Competition

Arctic Region - United States Department of State

Russian Strategic Interest in Arctic Heats Up as Ice Melts, by LSE IDEAS

Accession to Convention on the Law of the Sea Unnecessary to Advance Arctic Interests

Advancing U.S. Diplomacy in the Arctic

The Geopolitics of the Arctic – PoliAtlas